One week before Rodney Reed’s scheduled execution, students and community members gathered on the steps of the Tower to hold a vigil for Reed and to protest Texas’ judicial system.
Students gather on the Main Mall to hold a vigil for Reed. Carlo Nasisse | Daily Texan Staff
Reed was convicted of murdering Stacey Stites on the morning of April 23, 1996. The state claims Reed raped and murdered Stites. Reed’s attorney said new evidence, which includes a testimony and forensic evidence, proves Stites was killed, and her body was moved hours earlier than originally thought.
Reed’s original execution date was March 5, until the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued a stay of execution Monday. The stay gives Reed’s attorney time to present new evidence to the court.
Roderick Reed, brother of the accused, said the justice system is broken and functioning in a racially-motivated arena.
“The justice system should be blind,” Roderick said. “It should be given freely and fairly to everybody. I thought living in the United States of America — I thought that’s what we stood upon, but, apparently here in this case, we have not seen those things, and we will not rest until we see those things … We have the truth on our side and it will be seen, and it will be heard.”
Mark Clements, a man who spent 28 years in a Chicago prison after detectives beat him and forced him to sign a false confession to an arson that caused four murders, speaks at the vigil. Daulton Venglar | Daily Texan Staff
Ana Hernandez, Latin American studies and history senior and the vice president of UT’s Amnesty International student chapter, said the vigil is meant to raise awareness for everyone on death row.
“We have to remember that Rodney Reed isn’t the only innocent person on death row and certainly isn’t the only person on death row,” Hernandez said. “We really ought to be able to think about all people on death row and [remember] all people who have been killed on death row — particularly people who were later proven innocent and were wrongfully killed by the state.”
The jury that convicted Reed during the initial trial was composed of all-white members. Advocates for Reed say DNA tests were conducted unfairly and incorrectly.
Daulton Venglar | Daily Texan Staff
Correction: In an earlier version of this article, Stacey Stites' name was misspelled. It has since been updated.