In his most recent column, Jeremi Suri uses the March Madness hype to reflect on the quality of education that college athletes are getting under an immense pressure to perform. According to the University of Texas Athletic Department mission statement, college athletes receive the resources necessary to “achieve academically and compete athletically… that prepare them with skills for life.” They are provided with scholarships, extensive tutoring, and a network of support. The resource they are in most need of, however, is time.
A college athlete’s performance is a zero-sum game. On one hand, more time for school leaves less time for sports. On the other, more time for sports means less time for school; athletes come to class with “their bodies are broken down” who can “barely walk,” according to Suri. Put one of the athletes Suri is talking about in an 8 am class and it is unlikely they will learn much.
But is holding college athlete’s to a lower academic standard really the solution? If not, who is really willing give up what it takes to hold them to a lower athletic standard? Why separate “college athletes” from “college students,” even rhetorically?Suri is right. Universities should have a plan for all around excellence and that should include everyone. The purpose of universities is to uplift each individual student to success – whether they are full-time students, active duty students, student workers, or student athletes.
Shah is a business and government major from Temple
Editor's Note: This article has been updated since its original posting.
U.S. News & World Report recently released data that tracks enrollment in different disciplines for the graduate schools it ranks. Among those disciplines, engineering is the fastest-growing field, having increased its enrollment by 38 percent since 2005. Law, on the other hand, has seen declining enrollments because of tuition increases and lower salaries after graduation.
At UT, we see similar trends. The total enrollment in the Cockrell School of Engineering increased by 6.5 percent over the last 10 years. What's worth noting is that the enrollment in the computer science program, which falls under the College of Natural Sciences, increased more dramatically, by 28 percent. By contrast, enrollment in the Law School has decreased over 23 percent, and enrollment in the College of Liberal Arts has decreased by 25 percent.
It seems reasonable and mature that students are concerned about how to make a living after graduation. As the birthplace of Dell, Austin attracts many tech geeks and engineers. Thousands of people attend “Startup Crawl” and other similar events every year, where companies introduce their technologies. But that does not necessarily mean the city and the nation will be better off with more science majors.
A law degree, for example, can provide students with highly competitive skills such as critical thinking and strong writing. To be able to research, analyze and use principles to solve problems is key to success.
The same goes for the liberal arts. In a recently published interview with the Texan, Dean Randy Diehl of the College of Liberal Arts acknowledged that his field may not focus on bringing technical skills to the table, but rather on understanding enough history and culture to know why we are here as a society.
This also applies to whether students should spend time studying theory or more practical applications. Today, many students are so concerned about skill sets that they often forget the concepts behind them.
Brad Love, an associate professor in the Stan Richards School of Advertising and Public Relations said he would rather learn the principle of a simple design than a piece of fancy software. The way we write, draw and manufacture things is always going to change with constant developments in technology; however, by making sure that we are obtaining skills and knowledge that are never obsolete, we will be able to construct the work we do.
The reduction of COLA’s cohort sizes and the total number of graduate students since 2009 is a stark reminder that we don’t want to see area of studies such as philosophy, literature, art history and languages go away since cultured life depends on it.
Liu is an associate editor.
The Drag needs a makeover. Badly. Whether it’s the smell of urine that pervades the abandoned storefronts between 24th and 25th or the trash lying around trash cans up and down the sidewalk, one would have to be blind to not think so.
The Austin Transportation Department is currently seeking feedback on how to improve the Drag and the University's City Relations Agency along with the new My Guadalupe student organization are encouraging students to provide their ideas to the city. Since the area is the dividing line between campus and the largely student-inhabited West Campus, the city should definitely focus on listening to and complying with input from students.
Urban Outfitters recently purchased the leases of 5 stores on the Drag — some with shattered windows, graffiti and homeless people sleeping in their entryways. Some have complained this expansion will diminish the "weirdness" of Austin by means of replacing Manjus and Mellow Mushroom. The fact is that the Drag is and has been pretty corporate for awhile, and any businesses willing to clean up the trashed storefronts are doing the University community a service.
Bounds is an associate editor.
On Monday, after much fanfare, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, announced his candidacy for President of the United States. In doing so, he became the first major candidate — Democrat or Republican — to formally throw his hat into the ring, though numerous others have already all-but-declared.
Cruz, a darling of the Tea Party, launched his presidential campaign at Liberty University, the evangelical religious-right affiliated college in Lynchburg, Virginia founded by the late Jerry Falwell. In doing so, he pushed for a number of increasingly extreme right-wing fantasies, such as a flat tax and no assistance for struggling students. He was incessantly (and, in my opinion, rightfully) mocked across the board by media pundits for such asinine displays, but the outlets have appeared to underestimate Cruz's prowess as a political candidate.
In the lead-up to the 2012 senatorial election, Cruz was underestimated even more. He began the election polling in the single-digits against the odds-on favorite in the Republican primary (which is tantamount to election), then-Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst. However, Cruz is such an articulate and persuasive force on the campaign trail that he was able to sweep the endorsements of important Tea Party groups, as well as other conservative causes. Partially, this is due to Cruz's inimitable style of casually and confidentially lying on little stuff and big stuff alike.
Obviously, Cruz pulled off an improbable upset and was elected to the Senate in 2012. There is no reason to not think he can replicate this in the 2016 Republican primary. Much like the activist Left fell in love with Barack Obama during his 2008 presidential campaign, at points idolizing him as infallible in near hero-worship, the Right and the Tea Party have done the exact same thing with Ted Cruz. He is their "man on the white horse" who will lead them to the promised land, so to speak.
Furthermore, similar to how many on the left were unable to comprehend or recognize Obama's inevitable return to the reasonable center following the Democratic primary, it would make sense that the right would have similar cognitive dissonance over Cruz's inevitable return to the reasonable center, should he win the primary. For these reasons, Cruz should be treated as a contender-- if not a front-runner -- to not only win the Republican primaries, but the general election, as the 45th President of the United States.
Horwitz is the senior associate editor.